Saturday, August 22, 2009

StumbleUpon Doesn't Honor Permanent Redirects

The folks at StumbleUpon just gave me the worst website advice that I have ever heard.

When you change your domain name, StumbleUpon refuses to follow the permanent redirect to your new site. They recommend leaving the old website up with a "please click here" message instead!

Wait, really?

StumbleUpon provides a browser toolbar with a "Stumble!" button. When you click the button, it sends you to a random web page, and lets you rate it. If lots of people like your page, StumbleUpon will send more people there.

I've been running an online game from my personal website for about eight years. It eventually got pretty popular, averaging ~2 million pageviews a month. The load became too much for my home DSL connection, so about a month ago, I decided to move the game to Google AppEngine, on a separate domain. I diligently set up a permanent (301) redirect from the old website to the new website, and notified Google of my address change using Google Webmaster Tools.

For a while, everything was fine, but then, all of a sudden, I noticed my traffic had dropped by 50%. Puzzled, I checked my logs.

It turns out that about 50% of my traffic came from StumbleUpon; they were sending me hundreds of new visitors a day, some of whom would play the game for hours at a time. The game is a lot of fun, so it got hundreds of positive reviews. Eventually, StumbleUpon grew to represent a huge fraction of my inbound traffic. Now, all of it is gone.

StumbleUpon now says, "We are showing this site as unavailable. Should we check again?"

UPDATE (Jan 5 2010): StumbleUpon has removed this warning message from their site, but they're still not sending traffic to the redirected URL.

I emailed StumbleUpon about this, and they gave me this advice:

Hello Dan,

Thanks for your feedback,

Unfortunately, once you've redirected a site, you
are losing all reviews and traffic from the
original URL. There is nothing we can do about
this, as each unique URL in our community has it's
own unique review page.

If we allowed transfer of reviews and traffic
counts, we would facilitate gaming of our system.
You may however do a different type of redirect:
keep the homepage of the old URL alive and insert
a link that users must click to reach the new URL.
That way, the review page for the old URL will
still be accessible and the site will still regain
it's viral momentum and get stumbled around. While
doing this, you can slowly build reviews and
traffic for the new URL.

I hope this helped.

Regards,
Monica
xxxx@stumbleupon.com

This is horrible advice; nobody should ever do this.

If you follow Monica's advice, search engines like Google and Bing will continue to send searchers to the old website instead of the new website. Both Google and Bing rank websites by how many people link to them. Since the old website has more links, it will rank higher in the search results than the new website. Eventually, hopefully, you'll have two websites in Google and Bing, each performing only half as well as they should.

This is bad for my users and bad for searchers. Nobody wants to see duplicate content in their search results.

Gaming the system?

Monica says that if StumbleUpon honored redirects, it could be used to "game" their system. After all, what if I one day replaced my website with a redirect to a spam website? Then StumbleUpon might send users to some spam site.

But that's silly. Anyone who could redirect my website to spam could just as easily put spam right on my website! Redirecting doesn't help me game their system at all.

On the contrary, instead they're asking me to turn my old site into a pointless "doorway" page, forcing their users to click on an extra link just to get to the fun stuff. How is that good for their users?

If you don't believe me, then maybe you'll believe Google. StumbleUpon may claim to be worried about spam, but Google eats far more spam than StumbleUpon. People try to spam Google all the time, often by setting up useful sites and then replacing them with spam sites. If redirects made it easier to "game the system", then Google would stop honoring them.

Instead, Google gives clear and explicit directions explaining how to change your domain name. They recommend setting up a permanent 301 redirect, and notifying Google of the change of ownership using Google Webmaster Tools.

StumbleUpon should learn a lesson from Google and honor permanent redirects. It's the right thing to do for my users, Google's users, and their users.

1 comment:

stephen giorgi said...

I actually agree with stumbleupon here.
It sucks that you lost your traffic, but from their point of view, it makes total sense.
They don't follow redirects not because they are afraid of someone hacking your site and putting a redirect in without your knowledge, but because they are afraid you will put it in yourself, and redirect to some spam site.
I'm sorry you lost your traffic, and to be honest I was interested in playing you're game, but you've left no links to that game anywhere in this blog post.
Blog posting 101 should have taught you to always link back to your history each and every chance you get.
Edit the post and include a link to the game, so I can play it and give it a new review, and help you.